Geleneksel Kooperatiflerin Kendine Özgü Doğasından Kaynaklanan Sorunlar ve Bu Sorunların Çözüm Yolları
Özet
Geleneksel kooperatifler, ortaklarının sosyo-ekonomik ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak amacıyla kurulan, üye-kullanıcılar tarafından ortaklaşa sahip olunan ve "bir üye-bir oy" ilkesine dayalı demokratik bir yönetim anlayışıyla işletilen insan merkezli organizasyonlardır. Ancak geleneksel yapının getirdiği açık üyelik ilkesi, belirsiz tanımlanmış mülkiyet hakları, kârın yatırılan sermayeden ziyade işlem hacmine göre dağıtılması ve ortaklık paylarının ticarete konu olabileceği ikincil bir piyasanın bulunmaması gibi özellikler ciddi finansal ve yönetimsel kısıtlamalara yol açmaktadır. Bu mülkiyet yapısı ve üye heterojenliği; bedavacılık, ufuk sorunu, portföy sorunu, kontrol sorunu ve etkileme (nüfuz) maliyetleri olmak üzere beş temel problemi ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Yeni üyelerin geçmiş yatırımlardan maliyetsiz faydalanması, üyelerin uzun vadeli yatırımlar yerine kısa vadeli nakit ödemelerini tercih etmesi, bireysel risk tercihlerine göre portföy çeşitlendirmesi yapılamaması, profesyonel yöneticilerin denetim zorluğu ve farklı üye gruplarının çıkar çatışmaları kooperatiflerin özsermaye oluşturmasını ve finanse erişimini zorlaştırmaktadır. Söz konusu sorunların hafifletilmesi ve kooperatiflerin rekabet gücünün sürdürülebilmesi için kapalı üyelik politikaları, devredilebilir ve kıymetlendirilebilir hisse senetlerine imkan sağlayan ikincil piyasaların kurulması, çıkış ödemelerinin iyileştirilmesi ve yönetişim mekanizmalarının üye hedefleriyle uyumlu hale getirilmesini içeren yeni organizasyonel modellerin benimsenmesi gerekmektedir.
Traditional cooperatives are human-centered organizations established to meet the socio-economic needs of their members, jointly owned by member-users, and managed under a democratic governance approach based on the "one member, one vote" principle. However, characteristics inherent to this traditional structure—such as open membership, vaguely defined property rights, distribution of earnings based on patronage volume rather than invested capital, and the absence of a secondary market where ownership shares can be traded—lead to severe financial and managerial constraints. These property right structures and member heterogeneity give rise to five fundamental problems: free-riding, horizon, portfolio, control, and influence costs. Specifically, new members benefiting from past investments without contributing, members preferring short-term cash payouts over long-term investments, the inability to diversify portfolios according to personal risk preferences, difficulties in monitoring professional managers, and conflicts of interest among diverse member groups impair capital accumulation and limit access to financing. To mitigate these issues and sustain competitiveness, cooperatives must adopt new organizational models incorporating closed membership policies, secondary markets for transferable and tradable shares, improved exit payments, and governance mechanisms aligned with member objectives.
Referanslar
Bijman, J., Hendrikse, G. & Van Oijen, A. (2013) Accommodating two worlds in one organisation: changing board models in agricultural cooperatives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34 (3-5), 204-217.
Bonin, J. P., Jones D. C. & Putterman, L. (1993) Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Producer Cooperatives: Will Ever the Twain Meet?. Journal of Economic Literature, 31 (3), 1290–1320.
Borgen, S. O. (2002) Agency Problems in Norwegian Agricultural Cooperatives.
Borgen, S. O. (2004) Rethinking incentive problems in cooperative organizations. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33 (4), 383-393.
Chaddad, F. & Iliopoulos, C. (2013) Control rights, governance, and the costs of ownership in agricultural cooperatives. Agribusiness, 29 (1), 3-22.
Chaddad, F. R. (2006). Investment constraints in agricultural cooperatives: theory, evidence and solutions. XLIV CONGRESSO DA SOBER “Questões Agrárias, Educação no Campo e Desenvolvimento”, 23 a 27 de Julho de 2006, Fortaleza, Brasil, (pp. 1-14)
Cook, M. L. & Chaddad, F. R. (2004) Redesigning cooperative boundaries: The emergence of new models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86 (5), 1249-1253.
Cook, M. L. (1995) The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77 (5), 1153-1159.
Cook, M. L., & Iliopoulos, C. (1999). Beginning to inform the theory of the cooperative firm: Emergence of the new generation cooperative. LTA, 4 (99), 525-535.
Cook, M. L., & Iliopoulos, C. (2000). Ill-defined Property Rights in Collective Action: the case of US Agricultural Cooperatives. In C. Ménard, (Ed.), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics. (pp. 335-348). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fahlbeck, E. (2007). The horizon problem in agricultural cooperatives–only in theory?. In K. Karantininis & J. Nilsson, (Ed.), Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies (pp. 255-274). Dordrecht: Springer.
Fanasch, P. & Frick, B. (2018) What Makes Cooperatives Successful? Identfying the Determinants of Their Organizational Performance. Journal of Wine Economics, 13 (3):282-308.
Gentzoglanis, A. (2007). Regulation, governance and capital structure in cooperatives. In K. Karantininis & J. Nilsson, (Ed.), Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies (pp. 151-167). Dordrecht: Springer.
Giannakas, K., Fulton, M., & Sesmero, J. (2016) Horizon and free-rider problems in cooperative organizations. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 372-392.
Gripsrud, G., Lenvik, G. H., & Olsen, N. V. (2001). Influence activities in agricultural cooperatives: the impact of heterogeneity. In S.O. Borgen, (Ed.), The Food Sector in Transition – Nordic Research. NILF Report 2001-2. (pp. 13-24). Oslo: Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
Hansmann, H. (1996). The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hansmann, H. (2013) All Firms Are Cooperatives-So Are Governments, Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 2 (2), 1-10.
ICA (2021). What is a cooperative? (15.12.2021 tarihinde https://www.ica.coop/en adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Iliopoulos, C., & Cook, M. L. (1999). The efficiency of internal resource allocation decisions in customer-owned firms: the influence costs problem. Comunicación presentada en la 3rd Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, September, Washington DC, (pp. 1-33).
Iliopoulos, C., & Hendrikse, G. (2009) Influence costs in agribusiness cooperatives: evidence from case studies. International Studies of Management & Organization, 39 (4), 60-80.
Kalegoras, N., Pennings, J. M. E. & Van Dijk, G. (2007). The Structure of Marketing Cooperatives, In K. Karantininis & J. Nilsson, (Ed.), Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies, (pp. 73-92). Dordrecht: Springer.
Karantininis, K. & Zago, A. (2001) Endogenous Membership in Mixed Duopsonies, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 83 (5), 1266–1272.
Malherbe, A. S. (2020). Member voice and influence: A study of cooperative governance in the Australasian dairy industry (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato).
Milgrom, P. & Roberts, J. (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. American Journal of sociology, 94, 154-179.
Nilsson, J. (1998) The emergence of new organizational models for agricultural cooperatives. Swedish Journal of agricultural research, 28, 39-48.
Nilsson, J. (1999) Co-operative Organisational Models as Reflections of the Business Environments, LTA, 4 (99), 449-470.
Nilsson, J., & Büchmann Petersen, S. (2001). The Rationale of Traditional Cooperatives – The Case of Danish Crown. In S.O. Borgen, (Ed.), The Food Sector in Transition – Nordic Research. NILF Report 2001-2. (pp.1-12). Oslo: Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
Olesen, H. B. (2007). The horizon problem reconsidered. In K. Karantininis & J. Nilsson, (Ed.), Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies, (pp. 245-253). Dordrecht: Springer.
Porter, P. K. & Scully, G. W. (1987) Economic efficiency in cooperatives. The Journal of law and economics, 30 (2), 489-512.
Royer, J. S. (1999) Cooperative organizational strategies: A neo-institutional digest. Journal of cooperatives, 14 (1142-2016-92748), 44-67.
Staatz, J. M. (1987) The structural characteristics of farmer cooperatives and their behavioral consequences. Cooperative theory: New approaches, 18, 33-60.
Sykuta, M. E. & Cook, M. L. (2001) A new institutional economics approach to contracts and cooperatives. American journal of agricultural economics, 83 (5), 1273-1279.
Vitaliano, P. (1983) Cooperative enterprise: an alternative conceptual basis for analyzing a complex institution. American journal of agricultural economics, 65 (5), 1078-1083.
