Tarımda Teknoloji Uygulamaları Örneği: Dijital İkiz
Özet
Artan dünya nüfusunun gıda ihtiyacını karşılamak amacıyla tarımsal verimliliği artırmak bir zorunluluk haline gelirken, Endüstri 4.0, Nesnelerin İnterneti (IoT) ve yapay zeka teknolojilerinin gelişimiyle dijital ikiz uygulamaları tarım sektörüne adapte edilmeye başlanmıştır. Dijital ikiz, gerçek dünyadaki fiziksel sistemlerin sanal ortamdaki sayısal eşdeğeri olarak süreçlerin uzaktan, anlık ve otomatik biçimde izlenmesine, analiz edilmesine ve simüle edilmesine olanak tanır. Bu teknoloji; uzaktan algılama, sensörler ve yapay zeka modellerini kullanarak toprak nemi, iklim koşulları ve bitki su stres indeksi (CWSI) gibi değişkenler üzerinden akıllı sulama, gübreleme ve ürün yönetimi kararlarının verilmesini sağlar. Böylece insan kaynaklı hatalar azaltılarak zaman, iş gücü ve girdi maliyetlerinden tasarruf edilirken, su ve toprak kaynaklarının sürdürülebilir kullanımı desteklenir. Bununla birlikte, gelişmekte olan ülkelerdeki yüksek altyapı maliyetleri, teknolojik bilgi eksikliği ve canlı organizmaları içeren karmaşık doğal sistemlerin dijital ortamla senkronize edilmesindeki zorluklar en önemli kısıtları oluşturmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, önerilen dijital ikiz konsepti; veri toplama, analiz ve modelleme adımlarıyla tarımsal süreçleri statik yapıdan dinamik ve karar destekli akıllı bir sisteme dönüştürme potansiyeli sunmaktadır.
While increasing agricultural efficiency to meet the food demand of the growing world population has become a necessity, digital twin applications have begun to be adapted to the agricultural sector through the development of Industry 4.0, Internet of Things (IoT), and artificial intelligence technologies. As a digital equivalent of physical systems in a virtual environment, the digital twin enables remote, real-time, and automated monitoring, analysis, and simulation of processes. By utilizing remote sensing, sensors, and AI models, this technology facilitates smart decision-making for irrigation, fertilization, and crop management through variables such as soil moisture, climatic conditions, and the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI). Consequently, human errors are minimized, saving time, labor, and input costs while supporting the sustainable use of soil and water resources. Nevertheless, high infrastructure costs in developing nations, a lack of technical knowledge, and challenges in synchronizing complex natural systems involving living organisms with digital environments represent major limitations. Overall, the proposed digital twin concept offers the potential to transform agricultural operations from static structures into dynamic, decision-supported smart systems through data generation, analysis, and modeling steps.
Referanslar
Verdouw CN, Wolfert J, Beulens AJM, Rialland A. Virtualization of food supply chains with the internet of things, Journal of Food Engineering; 2019;176:128-136.
Verdouw CN, Beulens AJM, Reijers HA, Vorst JGAJ.vd. A control model for object virtualization in supply chain management. Comput. In; 2015; 68, 116–131.
Verdouw CN, Wolfert J, Beulens AJM, Rialland A. Virtualization of food supply chains with the internet of things. J. Food Eng. 2016;176, 128–136.
Burg SVD, Kloppenburg S, Kok EJ, Voort, MVD. Digital twins in agri-food : Societal and ethical themes and questions for further research. Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences. 2021;93(1):98-125.
Pylianidis C, Osinga S, Athanasiadis IN. Introducing digital twins to agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2021;184 : 105942.
Li B, Zhong H, Chen Y, Leung C. Arming Decision Support Systems with Digital Twin and Internet of Things: A Desiderata. nternational Journal of Information Technology 2019; 25 No. 2.
Schleich B, Anwer N, Mathieu L, Wartzack S.. Shaping the Digital Twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Ann. 2017; 66 (1), 141–144.
Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A, Yon J, Hicks B. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2020;29, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002.
Boschert S. ve Rosen R. Digital Twin –2016. The Simulation Aspect. In: Hehenberger P. & Bradley D. (Eds.),Mechatronic Futures. Springer, Cham.
Verdouw C, ve Kruize JW. Digital twins in farm management: Illustrations from the FIWARE accelerators smartagrifood and fractals. In Nelson, W (ed), 7th AsianAustralasian Conf. Precis. Agric. 1–5. Hamilton, New Zealand: Precision Agrcultural Association New Zealand. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.893662.
Wright L, Davidson S. How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin. Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 2020;7, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4.
Verdouw C, Tekinerdoğan B, Beulens A, Wolfert S. Digital twins in smart farming. Journal of Agricultural Systems. 2021. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103046.
Angin P, Anisi MH, Göksel F, Gürsoy C, Büyükgülcü A. AgriLoRa: A Digital Twin Framework for Smart Agriculture. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, 2020; 11(4):77-96.
Janssen SJ, Porter CH, Moore AD, Athanasiadis IN, Foster I, Jones JW, Antle JM. Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Information and communication technology. Agric. Syst. 2017;155, 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.017 https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0308521X16305637. ISSN 0308521X..
Kamilaris A, Prenafeta-Boldú FX. Deep learning in agriculture: a survey. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018;147, 70–90.
Zhai Z, Martínez JF, Beltran V, Martínez NL. Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: survey and challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020;170, 105256.
Alves RG, Souza G, Maia RF, Tran ALH, Kamienski C, Soininen JP, AquinoJr PT, Lima F. A Digital Twin for Smart Farming. IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference Seattle -2019; USA.
Skobelev P, Laryukhin V, Simonova E, Goryanin O, Yalovenko V, Yalovenko O. Developing a smart cyber-physical system based on Digital Twins of plants. In: Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, 2020. Security and Sustainability (WorldS4), London, United Kingdom, 2020;pp. 522–527.
Monteiro J, Barata J, Veloso M, Veloso L, Nunes J.Towards sustainable Digital Twins for vertical farming. Thirteenth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM), Berlin, Germany 2018;234–239.
Vilćek J, Štefan K. Integrated index of agricultural soil quality in Slovakia. J. Maps, 2018;14, 68–76. [CrossRef].
Yin H, Cao Y, Marelli B, Zeng X, Mason AJ, Cao C. Soil Sensors and Plant Wearables for Smart and Precision Agriculture. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007764. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Basterrechea DA, Rocher J, Parra M, Parra L, Marin JF, Mauri PV, Lloret J. Design and Calibration of Moisture Sensor Based on Electromagnetic Field Measurement for Irrigation Monitoring. Chemosensors, 2018;9, 251. [CrossRef].
Söderström M, Sohlenius G, Rodhe L, Piikki K. Adaptation of regional digital soil mapping for precision agriculture. Precis. Agric., 2016;17, 588–607. [CrossRef].
Searle R, McBratney A, Grundy M, Kidd D, Malone B, Arrouays D, Stockman U, Zund P, Wilson P, Wilford J, et al. Digital soil mapping and assessment for Australia and beyond: A propitious future. Geoderma Reg., 2021;24, e00359. [CrossRef].
Reis ÂVD, Medeiros FA, Ferreira MF, Machado RLT, Romano LN, Marini VK, Francetto TR, Machado ALT. Technological trends in digital agriculture and their impact on agricultural machinery development practices. Revi. Ciência Agronômica, 2021;51, e20207740. [CrossRef]
Anonim. CEMA. Digital Farming: What Does It Really Mean? Availableonline:https://www.cema-agri.org/images/publications/position-papers/CEMA_Digital_Farming_-_Agriculture_4.0__13_02_2017_0.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2022).
Nasirahmadi A, Hensel O. Toward the Next Generation of Digitalization in Agriculture Based on Digital Twin Paradigm. Sensors,2022; 22, 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020498.
Villani G, Castaldi P, Toscano A, Stanghellini C, Cinotti TS, Maia, RF, Tomei F, Taumberger M, Zanetti P, Panizzi S. Soil Water Balance Model CRITERIA-ID in SWAMP Project: Proof of Concept. In Proceedings of the 2018 23rd Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT), Bologna, Italy, 2018;13–16 November pp. 398–404.
Goel RK. Yadav CS, Vishnoi S, Rastogi R. Smart agriculture–Urgent need of the day in developing countries. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst.2021; 30, 100512. [CrossRef]
Mehrabi Z, McDowell MJ, Ricciardi V, Levers C, Martinez JD, Mehrabi N, Wittman H, Ramankutty N, Jarvis A. The global divide in data-driven farming. Nat. Sustain. 2021; 4, 154–160. [CrossRef].
Jakku E, Taylor B, Fleming A, Mason C, Fielke S, Sounness C, Thorburn P. If they don’t tell us what they do with it, why would we trust them? Trust, transparency and benefit-sharing in Smart Farming. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2019;90–91, 100285.
Jakku E, Taylor B, Fleming, A, Mason C, Thorburn P. Big Data, Trust and Collaboration: Exploring the Socio-Technical Enabling Conditions for Big Data in the Grains Industry; CSIRO: Brisbane, Australia, 2016; p. 34.
Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt MJ. Big Data in Smart Farming—A review. Agric. Syst., 2017; 153, 69–80. [CrossRef]
Ingram J, Maye D. What are the implications of digitalisation for agricultural knowledge? Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020;4, 66. [CrossRef].
Chergui N, Kechadi MT, McDonnell M. The Impact of Data Analytics in Digital Agriculture: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Multi-Conference on: Organization of Knowledge and Advanced Technologies (OCTA), Tunis, Tunisia, 2020; 6–8 February; pp. 1–13.
West TD, Blackburn M. Is Digital Thread/Digital Twin Affordable? A Systemic Assessment of the Cost of DoD’s Latest Manhattan Project. In: Procedia Computer Science, 2017;vol. 114. Elsevier B.V., pp. 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.003.
Talkhestani BA, Jazdi N, Schlogl, W, Weyrich M. A concept in synchronization of virtual production system with real factory based on anchor-point method. In: Procedia CIRP,2018, vol. 67. Elsevier B.V., pp. 13–17. doi: 10.1016/j. procir.2017.12.168.
Kurth R, Tehel R, Paßler T, Putz M, Wehmeyer K, Kraft C, Schwarze H. Forming 4.0: Smart machine components applied as a hybrid plain bearing and a tool clamping system. Procedia Manuf. 2019;27, 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j. promfg.2018.12.045. ISSN 23519789.
Smith MJ. Getting value from artificial intelligence in agriculture. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2018;https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18522. http://www.publish.csiro.au/?pap er=AN18522. ISSN 1836-0939.
Idso SB, Jackson RD, Pinter PJ, Hatfield JL. Normalizing the stres–degree–day parameter for environmental variability. Agric. Meteorol. 1981; 24: 45-55.
