An Application with AHP – Topsis Hybrid Approach in Laptop Selection

Yazarlar

Alper Aytekin
Hakan Aydoğan
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0571-8535
Fatma Akgün
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7380-9463

Özet

This study addresses the complex multi-criteria decision-making problem of general-purpose laptop selection, an issue of growing importance due to the surge in remote work and distance education following the COVID-19 pandemic. To help buyers navigate technical specifications and financial constraints, the research implements a hybrid decision-making approach combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Based on expert input from three Management Information Systems (MIS) faculty members and product data retrieved from Hepsiburada.com in April 2022, eight evaluation criteria—price, weight, processor, memory speed, RAM, internal memory, screen size, and screen resolution—were weighted using AHP, while eight market alternatives were ranked using TOPSIS. The AHP evaluation revealed that price is the most critical decision criterion, followed by processor performance, RAM, internal memory, memory speed, screen resolution, screen size, and weight. The TOPSIS analysis ranked the Lenovo IdeaPad 3 as the most suitable laptop alternative, followed by the Dell Vostro 3510-F8066 and Asus X515JP-EJ2500, with the HP Pavilion 13-BB0007NT scoring lowest. Ultimately, the integrated AHP-TOPSIS methodology provides an effective, structured framework for consumers to make informed technological investments, although the rankings remain specific to the selected models and criteria.

Referanslar

Abdillah, A. (2022). Implementation of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method in the Laptop Election Decision Support System for Students and Community in Medan City. Zero: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan, 5(2), 21-34.

Aytekin, A., Akgün, F. & Aydoğan, H. (2021). Bartın Üniversitesi Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Öğrencilerinin Cep Telefonu Seçiminin Analitik Hiyerarşik Süreç ve Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşik Süreç Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Belirlenmesi. In Tekmez Kulu & Hamza Kahriman (Eds.), Bireyden Yapay Zekaya Sosyoekonomik ve Kültürel Çalışmalar (s. 1-25). Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi.

Aytekin, A. & Kuvat, O. (2018). Dizüstü Bilgisayar Seçiminde Değerlendirilen Kriterlerin Önem Düzeylerinin AHP ile Belirlenmesi: 1. ve 2. Sınıf Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Öğrencileri Uygulaması. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(4), 193-211.

Bulak, M. E., Kozanoğlu, O., Aydoğduoğlu, Ş. N., Göçer, F. & Algül, R. (2021). E-Ticaret Sitelerinin Kullanılabilirliğinin AHP ve TOPSİS Yöntemleriyle Karşılaştırılması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (26), 493-509.

Çelik, K. & Aydoğan, H. Topsis Tabanlı Karar Verme Yaklaşımı: İstanbul’da Bir Uygulama. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 3(2), 158-174.

Dinçer, H. & Gorener, A. (2011). Performance Evaluation Using AHP-VIKOR and AHP-TOPSIS Approaches: The Case of Service Sector. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 29(3), 244-260.

Ersoy, Y. (2021). Equipment Selection for an E-commerce Company Using Entropy-based TOPSIS, EDAS and CODAS Methods During the COVID-19. LogForum, 17(3), 341-358.

Goswami, S. S., Behera, D. K. & Mitra, S. (2020). A Comprehensive Study of Weighted Product Model for Selecting the Best Product in Our Daily Life. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(2), 1-18.

Hwang, C. & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 186, 58-191.

Iqbal, M. & Simangunsong, A. (2020). Laptop Selection Decision Support System Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method. Login: Jurnal Teknologi Komputer, 14(2), 170-175.

Karim, R. & Karmaker, C. L. (2016). Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 7-13.

Kundakcı, N. (2017). An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Tablet Computer Selection. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(5), 36-48.

Lakshmi, T. M., Venkatesan, V. P. & Martin, A. (2015). Identification of a Better Laptop with Conflicting Criteria Using TOPSIS. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business, 7(6), 28-36.

Mitra, S. & Goswami, S. S. (2019). Selection of the Desktop Computer Model by AHP-TOPSIS Hybrid MCDM Methodology. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), 784-790.

Ömürbek, N., Makas, Y. & Ömürbek, V. (2015). AHP ve TOPSIS Yöntemleri ile Kurumsal Proje Yönetim Yazılımı Seçimi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (21), 59-83.

Pekkaya, M. & Aktogan, M. (2014). Laptop Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Dea, Topsis and Vikor. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 10(1), 107-125.

Rajak, M. & Shaw, K. (2019). Evaluation and Selection of Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications Using AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Technology in Society, 59, 101186.

Rashid, B., Iqbal, J. & Su, L. J. (2020). Landslide Susceptibility Analysis of Karakoram Highway Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Scoops 3D. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(7), 1596-1612.

Saaty, T. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281.

Saaty, T. (1980). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tamer, E. & Gür, Ş. (2017). Online Alışveriş Siteleri İçin AHP ve TOPSİS Yöntemleri ile 3PL Firma Seçimi. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 819-834.

Tampi, Y. A., Pangemanan, S. S. & Tumewu, F. J. (2016). Consumer Decision Making in Selecting Laptop Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method (Study: HP, Asus and Toshiba). Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 315-322.

Tunca, M., Aksoy, E., Bülbül, H. & Ömürbek, N. (2015). AHP Temelli TOPSIS ve ELECTRE Yöntemiyle Muhasebe Paket Programı Seçimi. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 53-71.

Uslu, A., Kızıloğlu, K., İşleyen, S. K. & Kahya, E. (2017). Okul Yeri Seçiminde Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemine Dayalı AHP-TOPSIS Yaklaşımı: Ankara İli Örneği. Politeknik Dergisi, 20(4), 933-943.

Vorachit, B. & Srichetta, P. (2014). Applying AHP to Evaluate Hydropower Projects of Lao PDR in Implementation of the Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan. In Advanced Materials Research, 931, 768-773.

Xiaolan, Z. & Jun, J. (2010). A Research on the Selection and Evaluation of Supplier for Laptop. In 2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM) IEEE, 2, 674-676.

Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Al-Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. L. M., Hussain, M. & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Evaluation and Selection of Open-source EMR Software Packages Based on Integrated AHP and TOPSIS. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 53, 390-404.

Yayınlanan

12 Ekim 2022

Lisans

Lisans