A Comparative Analysis of William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Nizami Ganjavi’ S Layla and Majnun as Universal Portrayals of Unrequited Love
Özet
This comparative analysis examines William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Nizami Ganjavi’s Layla and Majnun as universal portrayals of destructive, unrequited love across Western and Eastern literatures. Operating within restrictive patriarchal societies where parental authority and social codes dominate, both classic texts recount the tragic fates of star-crossed lovers whose passion subverts established social order. Crucially, the protagonists deviate from traditional gender roles: heroines Juliet and Layla demonstrate agency, courage, and self-willed independence by defying their fathers' arranged marriages, whereas Romeo and Majnun exhibit emotional vulnerability, passivity, and tearful despair—traits condemned as effeminate by their societies. Despite distinct cultural contexts and narrative structures—where Shakespeare emphasizes romantic, physical passion leading to double suicide, while Nizami stresses chaste separation, spiritual purification, and divine love—the two works share significant storyline parallels. These include rival suitors, supportive allies like Friar Lawrence and Nowfal, light and dark symbolism, and an overarching submission to fate. Ultimately, the study demonstrates that both narrative traditions critique oppressive patriarchal structures, showing that when young lovers prioritize authentic affection over societal expectations and traditional gender norms, their defiance leads to earthly transgression, tragic death, and a spiritual reunion attainable only in heaven.
Referanslar
Belsey, C. (2001). The name of the rose in Romeo and Juliet. In R.S. White (Ed.), Romeo and Juliet: Shakespeare's tragedies (pp. 46-63). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Becon, T. (1995). Of the duty of maids and young unmarried women. In Kate Aughterson (Ed.), Renaissance Woman: A Sourcebook (pp. 26-28). London and New York: Routledge.
Bloom, H. (1998). Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead Books.
Brook, A. (1908). Brooke's “Romeus and Juliet” being the original of Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet. New York: Duffield and Company
Brown, C E. (1996). Juliet’s taming of Romeo. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 36(2), 333-55.
Evans, G. B. (2003). The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, A. (1999). Gender, sex & subordination in England 1500-1800. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Ganjavi, N. (1997). Layla and Majnun: Prose adaptation by Colin Turner. London: John Blake Publishing.
Hasson, M. (2018). Crayz in Love: The story of Laila and Majnun in Early Modern South Asia. Doctoral dissertation, Harward University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.
Kristeva, J. (2001). Romeo and Juliet: Love-hatred in the couple. In R.S. White (Ed.), Romeo and Juliet: Contemporary Critical Essays (pp. 68-84). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Levend, A. S. (1959). Arap, Fars ve Türk edebiyatlarında Leylâ ve Mecnûn hikayesi. Ankara: TTK Yayınları.
Lane, E., W. (1863). An Arabic-English lexicon: Derived from the best and the most copious Eastern Sources. London: Williams and Norgate.
Moisan, T.(1991). “O any thing, of nothing, first create!’; Gender and patriarchy and the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet.” In Dorothea Kehler and Susan Baker (Eds), In another country: Feminist perspectives on renaissance drama (pp. 113–36). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow,
Pala, İ. (2016). Kitâb-ı aşk. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
Radel, N. F. (2000.) Queer Romeo and Juliet: teaching early modern ‘sexuality’ in Shakespeare’s ‘Heterosexual’ Tragedy. Approaches to teaching Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, 67, 91-97.
Shakespeare, W. (2005). Romeo and Juliet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traub, V. (2003) Gender and sexuality in Shakespeare. In Margreta de Grazia & Stanley Wells (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare (pp. 129-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
