Üretim Açısından Tıkanıklık Maliyetleri
Özet
Bu çalışma, kentsel bölgelerde yaşanan trafik tıkanıklığının işletmeler, üretim süreçleri ve genel ekonomik verimlilik üzerindeki maliyet ile etkilerini kapsamlı bir şekilde incelemektedir. Tıkanıklık, çalışanların işe gidiş geliş sürelerini ve ürün ya da hizmet teslimat masraflarını artırarak işletmelerin etkin pazar büyüklüğünü sınırlandırmakta, lojistik ile stok tutma maliyetlerini yükseltmekte ve birim üretim maliyetlerini olumsuz etkilemektedir. Çalışmada, günlük trafik hacminden kaynaklanan tekrarlayan tıkanıklık ile kaza, yol yapımı ve olumsuz hava koşulları gibi olağan dışı durumlardan doğan tekrarlamayan tıkanıklık türleri ayırt edilmekte; doğrudan, dolaylı, içsel, dışsal ve çevresel emisyonları kapsayan toplumsal maliyet bileşenleri ayrıntılı olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Tıkanıklığın ölçülmesinde sadece kapasite ve trafik akışını dikkate alan mühendislik yaklaşımı yerine, toplumsal olumsuzlukları ve dışsal maliyetleri de hesaba katan ekonomik yaklaşımın kullanılması gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. Tıkanıklık maliyetlerini hafifletmek amacıyla plaka tayınlaması ve karayolu fiyatlandırması gibi zorunlu yönetim stratejilerinin yanı sıra; esnek çalışma saatleri, sıkıştırılmış çalışma haftaları, uzaktan çalışma (tele-çalışma) ve Tam Zamanında (JIT) üretim-dağıtım teknikleri temel çözüm önerileri olarak öne sürülmektedir. Bu tür esnek ve yenilikçi düzenlemeler, işletmelerin genel giderlerini düşürürken ulaşımdan kaynaklanan emisyonları da azaltarak hem ekonomik rekabet gücünü hem de kentsel sürdürülebilirliği desteklemektedir.
This study comprehensively examines the costs and impacts of traffic congestion in urban areas on businesses, production processes, and overall economic efficiency. Congestion limits the effective market size of businesses, increases logistics and inventory holding costs, and negatively affects unit production costs by raising employee commuting times and product or service delivery expenses. The study distinguishes between recurring congestion caused by daily traffic volume and non-recurring congestion arising from unusual events such as accidents, roadworks, and adverse weather conditions; it also thoroughly evaluates social cost components including direct, indirect, internal, external, and environmental emission impacts. In measuring congestion, it emphasizes the necessity of an economic approach that accounts for social externalities and societal impacts, rather than relying solely on engineering approaches focused on capacity and traffic flow. To mitigate congestion costs, in addition to mandatory management strategies such as license plate rationing and road pricing, flexible work arrangements—including flexible working hours, compressed workweeks, and teleworking—along with Just-In-Time (JIT) production and distribution techniques are presented as key solutions. Implementing these flexible and innovative arrangements lowers operating expenses and reduces transport emissions, thereby supporting both economic competitiveness and urban sustainability.
Referanslar
Anbaroglu, B., Heydecker, B. & Chengc, T. (2014). Spatio-temporal clustering for non-recurrent traffic congestion detection on urban road networks, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 48, 47-65.
Brady, J.F. (2011). Using telework and flexible work arrangements as a congestion mitigation strategy, Master of Science in Engineering Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
Brown, T. (2011). Five cities with congestion pricing. This Big City. Retrieved from (30.10.2022 tarihinde, http://thisbigcity.net/five-cities-with-congestion-pricing/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Blackburn, J. (2012). Valuing time in supply chains: Establishing limits of time-based competition, Journal of Operations Management. 30(5), 396-405.
Blauwens, G., De Baere, P., & Van de Voorde, E. (2016). Transport economics. Antwerp: De Boeck.
Clements, L.M., Kockelman, K.M. & Alexander, W. (2021). Technologies for congestion pricing, Research in Transportation Economics, 90, 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100863
Gavanas, N., Tsakalidis, A. & Latinopoulou, M.P. (2017). Assessment of the marginal social cost due to congestion using the speed flow function, Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 250-258.
Hallenbeck, M. E., Ishimaru, J. M., & Nee, J. (2003). Measurement of recurring versus nonrecurring congestion. Washington State Department of Transportation. Retrieved from, (25.10.2022 tarihinde, https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/fullreports/568.2.pdf. Adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
International Labour Organization, ILO (2022). Towards safe, healthy and declared work in Ukraine, “ Telework Online Training Series International and EU Labour Standards Background paper, (05.11.2022 tarihinde, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---sro-budapest/documents/genericdocument/wcms_753334.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Ison, S., Dainty, A & Wall, S. (2004). The construction sector, congestion charging and exemptions, engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(6), 386-394.
Janwari, M, iwari, G. & Mir, M.S. (2019). Estimating congestion cost for ring road of Delhi, Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 2638-2655.
Kim, J. (2019). Estimating the social cost of congestion using the bottleneck model, Economics of Transportation, 19, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2019.100119.
Prud’homme, R., 1999. Road congestion: Magnitude & policies, Centro Studisuisistemi di Trasporto.
Prud’homme, R. & Bocarejo, J.P. (2005). The London congestion charge: A tentative economic appraisal, PIARC Seminar on Road Pricing with emphasis on Financing, Regulation and Equity, Cancun, Mexico.
Raux, C., Souche, S. & Pons, D. (2012). The efficiency of congestion charging: Some lessons from costebenefit analyses, Research in Transportation Economics, 36(1), 85-92.
Struyf, E., Sys, C., Van de Voorde, E. & Vanelslander, T. (2022). Calculating the cost of congestion to society: A case study application to Flanders, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100573.
Weisbrod, G., Vary, D. & Treyz, G. (2001). NCHRP Report 463 - Economic implications of congestion. Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC.
Weisbrod, G., Vary, D., & Treyz, G. (2003). Measuring economic costs of urban traffic congestion to business. Transportation Research Record, 1839(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.3141/1839-10
Wood, N.S. (2010). Assessing the marginal cost of freeway congestion for vehicle fleets using passive GPS speed data, Master of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia.
