Sefalosporinlerin Etki Spektrumu ve Kullanım Alanları

Yazarlar

Abdullah Gölbol

Özet

Sefalosporinler; gerek ayaktan, gerek yatarak tedavide en sık kullanılan antimikrobiyallerdendir. Antimikrobiyal aktivitelerine dayalı olarak beş grupta incelenirler. Birinci kuşaktan üçüncü kuşağa doğru gram pozitif aktivite azalırken gram negatif etkinlik artar. Dördüncü kuşak her iki gruba etkiliyken, beşinci kuşak MRSA etkinliği ile diğerlerinden ayrılır. Güvenlik profilinin makul ve etki spektrumlarının geniş olmasıyla kullanım alanları da santral sinir sistemi enfeksiyonları ve yaşamı tehdit eden enfeksiyonlardan deri yumuşak doku enfeksiyonlarına uzanan geniş bir yelpazede dağılır. Özellikle Genişlemiş Spektrumlu Beta Laktamaz (ESBL), İndüklenebilir Beta Laktamaz (IBL) gibi enzimleri üreten Enterobacteriacea, etkin kullanımı önünde bir tehdit oluşturur. Seftolozan tazobaktam ve seftazidim avibaktam gibi kombinasyonlar bu alanda umut vadetse de bunlara da direnç geliştiği gösterilmiştir.

Referanslar

Abraham EP. Cephalosporins 1945-1986. Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 2:1-14. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700342-00003. PMID: 3319494.

El-Shaboury SR, Saleh GA, Mohamed FA, et al. Analysis of cephalosporin antibiotics. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analyses. 2007;21;45(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jun 9. PMID: 17689910.

Corona A, Cattaneo D, Latronico N. Antibiotic Therapy in the Critically Ill with Acute Renal Failure and Renal Replacement Therapy: A Narrative Review. Antibiotics [Internet] 2022;11(12):1769. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121769.

Lepak AJ, Andes DR. Cephalosporins. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ (eds.). Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA :Elsevier/Saunders; 2020. p: 268-284.

Bui T, Preuss CV. Cephalosporins. [Updated 2022 Nov 6]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551517/

Crader MF, Varacallo M. Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis. [Updated 2022 Sep 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442032/

Norby SR. Short-term treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in women. Reviews of Infectous Diseases. 1990; 12:458–467.

Tartaglione TA, Polk RE. Review of the new second-generation cephalosporins: cefonicid, ceforanide, and cefuroxime. Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy. 1985;19(3):188-98.

Yu VL, Chiou CC, Feldman C, et al.; International Pneumococcal Study Group. An international prospective study of pneumococcal bacteremia: correlation with in vitro resistance, antibiotics administered, and clinical outcome. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2003;15;37(2):230-7. doi: 10.1086/377534. Epub 2003 Jul 7. PMID: 12856216.

Sirinavin S, Chiemchanya S, Visudhipan P, et al. Cefuroxime treatment of bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1984;25(2):273-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.25.2.273. PMID: 6608921; PMCID: PMC185488.

Pothineni VR, Parekh MB, Babar MM, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of cephalosporins for the treatment of Lyme disease. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2018;11;12:2915-2921. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S164966. PMID: 30254421; PMCID: PMC6141111.

Jean S, Wallace MJ, Dantas G, et al. Time for Some Group Therapy: Update on Identification, Antimicrobial Resistance, Taxonomy, and Clinical Significance of the Bacteroides fragilis Group. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2022;21;60(9):e0236120. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02361-20. Epub 2022 Jun 14. PMID: 35700139; PMCID: PMC9491163.

Shaikh S, Fatima J, Shakil S, et al. Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2015;22(1):90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 17. PMID: 25561890; PMCID: PMC4281622.

Chaudhry SB, Veve MP, Wagner JL. Cephalosporins: A Focus on Side Chains and β-Lactam Cross-Reactivity. Pharmacy (Basel). 2019;29;7(3):103. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030103. PMID: 31362351; PMCID: PMC6789778.

Tunkel AR, Hartman BJ, Kaplan SL, et al. Practice guidelines for management of bacterial meningitis. Clinical Infectios Diseases. 2004;39:1267–1284.

Chow AW, Finegold SM. In-vitro activity of ceftizoxime against anaerobic bacteria and comparison with other cephalosporins. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1982;10:45-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.suppl_c.45. PMID: 6296028.

Puri J, Revathi G, Kundra P, et al. Activity of third generation cephalosporins against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in high risk hospital units. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. 1996;50(7):239-43. PMID: 8979542.

Tamma PD, Rodriguez-Bano J. The use of noncarbapenem β-lactams for the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2017;64:972–980.

Saez-Llorens X, O’Ryan M. Cefepime in the empiric treatment of meningitis in children. The Pediatric Infectios Disease Journal. 2001;20:356–361.

Yahav D, Paul M, Fraser A, et al. Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infectous Diseases. 2007;7:338–348.

Kim PW, Wu YT, Cooper B, et al. Meta-analysis of a possible signal of increased mortality associated with cefepime use. Clinical Infectous Diseases. 2010;51:381–389.

Towne TG, Lewis JS, Echevarria K. Efficacy and safety of cefepime. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2009;9:4–5.

Corey GR, Wilcox M, Talbot GH, et al. Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2010; 51:641.

File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al. Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, doubled-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2010; 51:1395.

Zasowski EJ, Trinh TD, Claeys KC, et al. Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2022; 9:ofab606.

Quennan AM, Shang W, Kania M, et al. Interaction of ceftobiprole with beta-lactamases from molecular classes A to D. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2007;51:3089–3095.

Awad SS, Rodriguez AH, Chuang YC, et al. A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clinical Infectous Diseases. 2014;59:51–61.

Zhanel GG, Golden AR, Zelenitsky S, et al. Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin with Activity Against Carbapenem-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli. Drugs 2019; 79:271.

Stevens RW, Clancy M. Compassionate Use of Cefiderocol in the Treatment of an Intraabdominal Infection Due to Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Case Report. Pharmacotherapy 2019; 39:1113.

Portsmouth S, van Veenhuyzen D, Echols R, et al. Cefiderocol versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative uropathogens: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infectios Diseases. 2018; 18:1319.

Wunderink RG, Matsunaga Y, Ariyasu M, et al. Cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem for the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (APEKS-NP): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infectous Diseases. 2021; 21:213.

Bassetti M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021; 21:226.

Chiang TT, Tang HJ, Chiu CH, et al. Antimicrobial activities of cefoperazone-sulbactam in comparison to cefoperazone against clinical organisms from medical centers in Taiwan. Journal of Medical Science. 2016; 36, 229-233.

Kollef MH, Nováček M, Kivistik Ü, et al. Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2019; 19:1299.

MacVane SH, Pandey R, Steed LL, et al. Emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa during treatment is mediated by a single AmpC structural mutation. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017;61:e01183–17

Zhanel GG, Lawson CD, Adam H, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Drugs. 2013; 73:159.

Torres A, Zhong N, Pachl J, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infectous Diseases. 2018; 18:285.

Mazuski JE, Gasink LB, Armstrong J, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2016; 62:1380.

Nelson K, Hemarajata P, Sun D, et al. Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam is due to transposition of KPC in a porin-deficient strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae with increased efflux activity. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017;61:e00989–17

Gelecek

23 Ocak 2023

Lisans

Lisans