Matematik Eğitiminde Güncel Araştırma Desenleri
Özet
Bu çalışma, matematik eğitimi araştırmalarında öne çıkan güncel araştırma desenlerini—tasarım temelli araştırmalar, ders imecesi, tahmini öğrenme yörüngeleri ve öğretim deneyleri—detaylı şekilde incelemektedir. Tasarım temelli araştırmalar, kuram ve uygulama arasında köprü kurarak gerçek eğitim bağlamlarında yenilikçi öğretim tasarımlarının geliştirilmesini, döngüsel süreçlerle test edilmesini ve teori üretilmesini hedefler. Japon menşeli bir mesleki gelişim modeli olan ders imecesi, öğretmenlerin iş birliği içinde ders planlama, gözlemleme, tartışma ve revize etme adımlarından oluşan döngüsel bir yapı sunarak öğretmenlerin pedagojik alan bilgilerini güçlendirir. Yapılandırmacı yaklaşıma dayanan tahmini öğrenme yörüngeleri ise öğrenme hedefleri, öğrenme etkinlikleri dizisi, varsayımsal öğrenme süreci ve öğrenci bilgisinin ölçülmesi bileşenleri üzerinden öğretim tasarımlarının dinamik biçimde geliştirilmesine rehberlik eder. Son olarak öğretim deneyleri, yapılandırmacı bakış açısıyla özel olarak tasarlanmış ortamlarda öğrencilerin matematiksel bilgiyi nasıl inşa ettiklerini ilk elden deneyimlemeyi ve klinik görüşmeler aracılığıyla öğrenme süreçlerini derinlemesine ortaya koymayı amaçlar. Ele alınan bu dört desen, matematik eğitiminde hem teorik birikimi zenginleştirmekte hem de sınıf içi öğretim pratiklerinin sürekli ve nitelikli olarak iyileştirilmesine katkı sağlamaktadır.
This study thoroughly examines current research designs in mathematics education, namely design-based research, lesson study, hypothetical learning trajectories, and teaching experiments. Design-based research bridges theory and practice by aiming to develop innovative instructional designs in real educational contexts, testing them through iterative cycles, and contributing to theory building. Lesson study, a professional development model of Japanese origin, enhances teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through a cyclical process consisting of collaborative lesson planning, observation, discussion, and revision. Hypothetical learning trajectories, grounded in constructivism, guide the dynamic development of instructional designs through four key components: learning goals, sequences of learning activities, hypothetical learning processes, and assessment of student knowledge. Finally, teaching experiments aim to directly experience how students construct mathematical knowledge in specifically designed constructivist environments and to uncover learning processes in depth through clinical interviews. Collectively, these four designs enrich theoretical knowledge in mathematics education while contributing to the continuous and qualitative improvement of classroom instruction practices.
Referanslar
Akın, A. & Kabael, T. (2016). Bir matematik eğitimi araştırmasına dayalı öğretim deneyi deneyimi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi (Journal of Qualitative Research in Education), 4(3), 7- 27.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
Bakker, A., & Eerde, D. V. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 429-466). Springer, Dordrecht.
Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243–253.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The journal of the learning sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
Cavin, R. M. (2007). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teachers through microteaching lesson study. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, The Florida State University.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81-89.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
Cobb, P. ve Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-94.
Cumhur, F., & Güven, B. (2022). The effect of lesson study on questioning skills: improving students’ answers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(4), 969-995.
Design-Based Research Collective (DBRC). (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
Doorman, M., Bakker, A., Drijvers, P., & Wijaya, A. (2016). Design-based research in mathematics education. In Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 21-46).
Fernández, M. L. (2005). Learning through microteaching lesson study in teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 37-47.
Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
Fowler, S., Cutting, C., Fiedler, S. H., & Leonard, S. N. (2022). Design-based research in mathematics education: trends, challenges and potential. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1-24.
Inagaki, T. (1995) A historical research on teaching theory in Meiji-Era (in Japanese). Hyuuron-Sya, Tokyo.
Kurt, G. (2016). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development of preservice middle school mathematics teachers in statistics teaching: A microteaching lesson study. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
Kurt Birel, G. (2017). Matematik eğitimi araştırmaları bağlamında yeni bir yaklaşım: Ders imecesi. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 1(1), 60-82.
Leavy, A. (2014). Looking at practice: revealing the knowledge demands of teaching data handling in the primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1-27.
Lewis, C. (2000). Lesson Study: The Core of Japanese Professional Development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 24-28, 2000).
Shimizu, Y. (2020). Lesson study in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 472-474. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
Simon, M.A. (2014). Hypothetical learning trajectories in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 272-275. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91-104.
Smeyers, P., de Ruyter, D. J., Waghid, Y., & Strand, T. (2014). Publish yet perish: On the pitfalls of philosophy of education in an age of impact factors. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 33(6), 647–666.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. R. Lesh and A. E. Kelly (Eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education içinde (s. 267–307). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steffe, L. P,. & Ulrich, C. (2014). Constructivist teaching experiment. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 134-141. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
Uygan, C. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin zihnin geometrik alışkanlıklarının kazanımına yönelik dinamik geometri yazılımındaki öğrenme süreçleri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
Uygan, C. (2019). Öğrenci matematiğini araştırmada öğretim deneyi yöntemi: Kuramsal temeller ve örnek bir uygulamadan yansımalar. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(2), 792-825.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
