Wheat Agriculture and Applied of Conservation Tillage Methods in Adana
Özet
This study examines wheat cultivation and the implementation of conservation tillage methods in the Adana region of Turkey. Adana represents a prominent agricultural hub contributing about 3.8% of Turkey's total wheat output, benefiting from fertile clay loam soils and a favorable Mediterranean climate. Historically, wheat farming in Adana has relied heavily on conventional tillage methods that feature intensive soil inversion, residue burning or burial, and frequent machinery operations, resulting in accelerated soil compaction, erosion, high fuel consumption, and significant organic matter depletion. In response to these sustainability challenges, conservation tillage is recommended based on three core principles: maintaining at least 30% crop residue on the soil surface, minimizing field traffic, and adopting systematic crop rotations involving crops like cotton, corn, and legumes. Specific practical applications include chisel plows, disc harrows, rototillers, and direct sowing techniques. Academic research in the region demonstrates that transitioning to reduced or no-till practices effectively enhances soil aggregate stability, boosts organic carbon content, preserves soil moisture, and achieves 81–86% savings in fuel and time compared to traditional approaches. Consequently, adopting conservation tillage provides an economically viable and environmentally protective alternative for sustainable long-term wheat production in Adana.
Referanslar
Acar, M., Celik, I., Gunal, H., 2017. Effects of long-term tillage systems on soıl water content and wheat yield under mediterranean conditions, Journal of New Theory, vol.17, pp.98-108.
Aryal, J.P., Sapkota, T.B., Jat, M.L., Bishoni D.K, 2015. On-Farm Economıc And Envıronmental Impact Of Zero-Tıllage Wheat: A Case Of North-West In¬dıa, Experimental Agriculture , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , pp. 1 – 16.
ASABE, 2013. Terminology for Soil Engaging Components for Conservation - Tillage Planters, Drills, and Seeders. ASABE Standards Joseph, MI, USA., S477, 364-369.
Aykanat, S., Karaağaç, H.A., Barut, H., Sevilmiş, U., 2019. Farklı Toprak İşle¬me ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin Buğdayda Bazı Agronomik Özellikler Üzerine Etkisi, Uluslararası Doğu Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2):136-144.
Aykanat, S., Barut, H., 2018. Buğday Tarımında Farklı Ekim Yöntemleri ve Sula¬manın Teknik Yönden Karşılaştırılması, Uluslararası Doğu Akdeniz Tarım¬sal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi.
Barut, Z B., 2006. Ekim Makinaları, Ed. Serdar Öztekin Tarım Makinaları 2, Nobel Kitapevi Adana, , s.408.
Barut, Z.B. and Celik, I., 2010. Different Tillage Systems Affect Plant Emergen¬ce, Stand Establishment and Yield in Wheat-Corn Rotation, Phılıppıne Agrıcultural Scıentıst, 93(4):392-398.
Barut, Z.B. and Celik, I., 2017. Tillage Effects on Some Soil Physical Proper¬ties in a SemiArid Mediterranean Region of Turkey, Chemical Enginee¬ring Transactions vol 58.
Barut, Z.B., Celik, I., Turgut, M.M., 2010. Buğday Tarımında Farklı Toprak İşle¬me Sistemlerinin Toprağın Bazı Fiziksel Özelliklerine Etkisi, Tarım Maki¬naları Bilimi Dergisi, 6(4):237 – 246.
Celik, I., Günal, H., Acar, M., Acir, N., Barut, Z.B., Budak, M., 2019. Evaluating the long-term effects of tillage systems on soil structural quality using visual assessment and classical methods, Soil Use and Menagement. 36:223–239.
Celik, I., Günal, H., Acir, N., Barut, Z.B., 2021. Soil quality assessment to com¬pare tillage systems in Cukurova Plain, Turkey. Soil & Tillage Research, 208(104892):104892.
Celik, I., Günal, H., Acar, Gok, M., Barut, Z.B., Pamiralan, H., 2017. Long-term tillage and residue management effect on soil compaction and nitrate leac¬hing in a Typic Haploxerert soil, Internatıonal Journal Of Plant Productıon, 11(1):131-149.
Celik, I., Günal, H., Acar, M., Acir N., Barut Z.B., Budak, M., 2019. Evaluating the long- term effects of tillage systems on soil structural quality using visu¬al assessment and classical methods, Soil Use and Menagement.
Hobbs, P.R., Gupta, R.K., 2004. Problems and challenges of no-till farming for the rice–wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains in South Asia. In: Lal, R., Hobbs, P., Uphoff, N. and Hansen, D.O. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture and the Rice–Wheat System. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 101–119; Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 101–121.
Irmak, S., Semercioğlu, T., 2012. Çukurova Bölgesi’nde Yetiştirilen Bazı Buğ¬day (Triticum Spp.) Çeşitlerinde Toprak-Bitki Selenyum İçeriği Arasındaki İlişki, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 2: 19 – 23.
Kassam, A., and Friedrich, T., 2012. An ecologically sustainable approach to agricultural production intensification: Global perspectives and develop¬ments. Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions Science Reports. Special Issue 6: 1-6.
Köller, K., 2003. Conservation tillage-technical, ecological and economic aspe¬cts. Koruyucu Toprak İşleme ve Doğrudan Ekim Çalıştayı, ss.9-34, 23-24 Ekim, Bornova, İzmir.
Moyer, J.R., Roman, E.S, Lindwal, C.W, Blackshaw R.E., 1994. Weed manage¬ment in conservation tillage systems for wheat production in North and South America, Crop Protection , 13(4):243-259.
Mujdeci, M., Sarıyev, A., Polat, V., 2005. Buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) Verimi¬nin Matematiksel Modellenmesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 11 (4): 349-353.
Schillinger, W.F., 2001. Minimum and Delayed Conservation Tillage for Wheat– Fallow Farming, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65(4):1203-1209.
T.C. Tarım Ve Orman Bakanlığı Adana İl Tarım Ve Orman Müdürlüğü (URL: http:// https://adana.tarimorman.gov.tr/)
TMO, 2021. 2020 Yılı Hububat Sektör Raporu, https://www.tmo.gov.tr/ Upload/ Document/sektorraporlari/hububat2020.pdf
TOB, 2022. Adana İl Tarım Ve Orman Müdürlüğü, https://adana.tarimorman. gov.tr/)
TÜİK, 2020. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Ankara . (URL: http://www. tuik. gov. tr)
TÜİK, 2021. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Ankara . (URL: http://www. tuik. gov. tr)
